Insurance Contract Requiring Arbitration Claims for Premium
Share This Page
Representation of a casino resort developer against claims that it, in addition to the owner of the casino, was a party to an insurance contract requiring it to arbitrate claims for premium. After an adverse decision in the trial court, obtained an emergency stay of enforcement and ultimate reversal on appeal.
We use cookies to improve the functionality and performance of our online services. Information on the cookies and other tracking technologies used can be found on our Cookie Policy page, along with instructions on disabling them. If you continue to use this website you consent to our use of cookies.
Email Disclaimer
Before communicating with us by e-mail, please note that unsolicited emails and information sent to Goulston & Storrs PC do not create an attorney-client relationship with any of our attorneys, nor do they necessarily impose an obligation of confidentiality on us. Unless you are an existing client of the firm, having received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular matter, you should not send us any confidential information or sensitive materials. Information found on www.goulstonstorrs.com is for informational purposes only. It should not be construed as legal advice and is not a solicitation for professional employment. By clicking “Yes, I Agree” below, you are confirming that you have read and understand this notice.